Proof in the Pudding

On August 14, 2013, the Evangelical Lutheran Church in America elected Elizabeth Eaton as its presiding bishop.  She is the first woman bishop in American Lutheran history.

Eaton carried the vote with a two-thirds majority (600 of 889 votes) against incumbent Mark Hanson, a popular and beloved bishop who led the ELCA through a tumultuous 12 years, including the 2009 churchwide decision to ordain people in homosexual relationships, which resulted in a number of congregations leaving the ELCA.  Hanson was widely expected to be elected for a third term; you could hear gasps in the Pittsburgh conference center when the penultimate ballot revealed that Eaton had taken the lead in votes.

I was watching the action unfold in Pittsburgh via the video streaming from the ELCA website—and, of course, via social media—and saw several comments that either rejoiced in Eaton’s gender, or else wondered whether she was elected because of it.  I have two completely different reactions to this.  And that’s OK, because I’m Lutheran, and we’re down with paradox.

The first reaction is irritation: Bishop Eaton is an imminently qualified person with a strong vision and a gift for articulating it.  And based on the observations circulating through social media from those who know her, she is eminently gifted for the bishop’s work of pastoring pastors (and in the case of the ELCA’s presiding bishop, pastoring synodical bishops).  It irks me that some people choose to point to her gender to mitigate her success in the election.

The second reaction is: WOOHOO, A FEMALE PRESIDING BISHOP!

Or, in the more elegant phrasing of the Huffington Post: another stained glass ceiling shattered!

Despite my annoyance at those who single out Eaton’s gender, it does matter.  Watching the results of the fifth and final ballot streaming on the ELCA’s website, I was shocked to find myself crying big, wet, crocodile tears when I saw that Bishop Eaton was elected, not just with a majority of the vote, but with a two-thirds majority, over Mark Hanson, whom ELCA pastor Jennie Chrien succinctly describes as “the whole denomination’s sweet grandpa.”  Believe me, I do not shed tears because I find the whole ecclesial ballot process so moving. I cry because the person who was elected presiding bishop of the ELCA was, for the first time, a woman.

Those tears didn’t simply come because I am a woman and a feminist, but also and equally because I belong to a church that, despite its commitment to inclusivity, perennially struggles with actually being diverse.  The whiteness (“European”-ness) of our denomination was remarked upon by Bishop Eaton in her acceptance speech, and one has only to watch a few minutes of any given plenary session at this churchwide assembly to notice that, with few exceptions, the string of speakers is one (generally white) man after another.

On a historical side note, we also have a track record of being somewhat blind to this problem.  When dealing with the possibility of women’s ordination in 1970, the president of the American Lutheran Church (a predecessor body of the ELCA) met with American Lutheran Church Women–a powerful auxiliary group–to discuss a recommendation that women’s ordination would be discussed at a churchwide convention:

ALCW officers asked how the report would be “transmitted to the [ALC’s] general convention.” Schiotz replied that it would come in the usual way, through the Executive Committee of Church Council. At this point, Evelyn Streng of the ALCW leaned across the table and “pointedly inquired”: “‘Dr. Schiotz, are there any women on this committee that’s dealing with the ordination of women?'” Streng later reported that Dr. Schiotz “looked as if he had been thunderstruck. He paused, and just hesitated, and, he said, ‘Well, why, no.'”[1]

Related historical sidenote: the Lutheran Church of America (another predecessor body of the ELCA) convened in 1970 to change the language of a bylaw in such a way that women would be eligible for ordination (literally, all they did was change the word “man” to “person”).  When the edit passed (easily), their president, Rev. J. Marshall, waited until the tumultuous applause had died down before sardonically observing:

The proof of the pudding will be in the eating.[2]

Not exactly inspirational words, Marshall.

But back to my unashamed weeping. Those tears are also because women’s ordination was historically a very big deal for Lutheran bodies–it remains one of the huge divisions between the ELCA and the Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod.  Lutheran bodies started ordaining women in 1970, more or less because they had run out of options.  They’d afforded women the right to vote in congregations a decade before, and in doing so, had vacated the authority of interpretations of texts like 1 Timothy 2:12 that denied women any official voice in ecclesial processes.  After that, it was only a matter of time.

Yet it still took another 22 years until Lutherans elected a woman bishop of one of the 65 synods of the ELCA.  April Ulring Larson was elected in 1992 as bishop of the La Crosse Area Synod.   Do you know what else happened in 1992?  Hurricane Andrew, Rodney King, and Aladdin.  Remember those?  I can, and I wasn’t alive when Michael Jackson wrote “Thriller.”  1992 wasn’t that long ago.

That “proof in the pudding” that Marshall noted would be necessary has been shown time and time again by the female pastorate of the ELCA, and in the wake of the success of women’s ordination, there are women (and men) who have been asking for their own proof: proof that in this denominational pudding, there is recognition and celebration of that success, and a commitment to its continuance.

Those of us in ELCA seminaries, which are about half-male, half-female, have started to look askance at the pastorate, of which only 23% is female–and those women are disproportionately to be found in smaller, declining congregations instead of robust or urban calls.[3]  Bishop Eaton’s election is proof, not just for Marshall’s camp, but for this latter one as well.  The motto of the Churchwide Assembly, “Always being made new,” isn’t an empty platitude—it’s a promise.

Bishop Eaton’s gender shouldn’t (and doesn’t) stand in for her actually being able to do the job, but it does matter.  It’s why the people I’ve talked to about the election call this a historic day.  It’s what those surprising tears were about.  It’s why the movement of the Spirit seems especially powerful at the churchwide assembly (which, lest you think this is all about pastors in pantyhose, also moved to encourage churchwide conversation about immigrant reform and introduced a new social statement on criminal justice).

It’s another reason why I stay with the church I was raised in, and in the midst of so much tumult, feel hope and pride.

Thank you, Bishop Hanson, for your impeccable service; and blessing, Bishop-Elect Eaton, on what is indeed a historic day.

 

A version of this post originally appeared on the author’s personal blog, http://lutheranmoxie.wordpress.com

Image source: Michael Maggs (Attribution via Wikimedia Commons)

 

[1] Evelyn Streng, “Interview with Evelyn Streng by Paul D. Opsahl,” January 10, 1985, Archives of Cooperative Lutheranism, Lutheran Council in the USA, ELCA Archives, Chicago, 44 and Schiotz, “Interview,” 302–03. Both Streng and Schiotz recall the incident.  Quoted in McArver, “The Americanization of American Lutheranism.”


[2] Pamela Ilott, prod.  1971.  “The Ordination of Pastor Platz.”  In Lamp Unto My Feet.  Columbia Broadcasting System.


[3] Mary W. Anderson. 2010. “The fortieth anniversary of women’s ordination in the Lutheran church.” Dialog 49, no. 4: 354-357. ATLA Religion Database with ATLASerials, EBSCOhost (accessed February 15, 2013).

 

Share this!
  • Print
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • RSS
  • Twitter

11 thoughts on “Proof in the Pudding

  1. 1 Timothy 2:12
    New American Standard Bible (NASB)
    “But I do not allow a woman to teach or exercise authority over a man, but to remain quiet.”

    Hm…doesn’t say anything about glass ceilings or gender equality. The woman may indeed be talented and skilled enough for the job, but what we have to look at is whether or not it is pleasing to GOD. Lutheran, Presbyterian, or whatever denomination we are, we are all Christians. As such, we should seek to please God above all others, INCLUDING OURSELVES. The bible says that if we love God, we’ll obey His commands. She’s doing the opposite.

    If she felt “led” or “called” to be a bishop or be in ministry, she should have tested her supposed calling by the scriptures, and they say…”But I do not allow a woman to teach or exercise authority over a man, but to remain quiet.” If it was merely a desire, or at the behest of others, then all the more so.

    But what if she still felt led to preach the word of God to others? Well, get into women’s ministries! Guide and council younger women how to be godly wives, mothers, and singles!

    I’m not saying this to be mean, but hopefully to enlighten you to the truth. God desires obedience over sacrifice. Instead of praising her achievements as a woman in a male-dominated field (as the world would do), we must see this how GOD sees this: a woman living in sin while claiming to represent Christ!

    May God bless you and her as only the Father can do.

    1. While it’s beyond the scope of this article to address your basic concerns about women’s ordination, I certainly encourage you to take a look at how church bodies who do ordain women arrived at their decision through faithful contemplation of God’s will. The article on the Americanization of American Lutheranism that I cited in my post contains a thorough account of the Lutheran process from a historical perspective.

      Thank you for your blessing. May the Mothering Christ who brought us to new birth richly bless you as well.

  2. Thank you, Victoria, for capturing this moment and articulating some of its significance for the State of Formation community! As a fellow Lutheran, I appreciate your reflection with both your personal reaction and a view towards the history that led to this more than some of the other media coverage.

    As a brief reply to the 1 Tim 2:12 comment above (since I’m not sure I can prevent myself from saying something)… I’m giving thanks to God for the women who first witnessed to the empty tomb; for Prisca, Phoebe, Junia, Euodia, and Syntyche, women who Paul called his co-workers in the gospel; for Bishop April Larson and newly-elected Presiding Bishop Eaton; and for all the women God will continue to call into service of the good news of Christ.

    Thanks again, Victoria!

    1. Thank you for your comment and your compliment. 🙂

      I love how you lifted up the women of the earliest church! It was only this past year that a professor pointed out that 16 of the names Paul lauds in Romans 16 (easy to remember, right?) belong to women. I remember the look on the faces of the class–we were thunderstruck. It was like, “Why have I been managing to emerge from the NT all this time with the idea that women weren’t leaders in the early church?”

  3. Very good article! Thanks.

    Let me also say that you have a very gracious manner in responding to criticism.

  4. Thank you so much for your article. I too wept as I read the news release about Bishop Elizabeth. She and I were elected synodical bishops the same year-2006 and have had the privilege of being together ay the Academy of Bishops gatherings each year (ELCA/ELCIC). She will be a marvellous gift of leadership to the church. You might also be interested to know that there is regular consultation between ELCIC/ELCA/Anglican Church of Canada /Episcopalian USA, which now have three women out of the four national leaders meeting together to work towards common ministry goals.

    1. Thank you for your comment!

      It is absolutely incredible to see women appearing more and more frequently at the highest levels of church hierarchy. The Spirit is palpably moving across our denominations! Thank you for mentioning the consultation between the Lutheran and Episcopal bodies of Canada and the US–I did not know that such a thing regularly occurred! What a fantastic opportunity for ecumenical dialogue and ministry.

      Blessings on your continued work on behalf of the ELCIC!

  5. Just a note of clarification: if your tears were heartfelt, they probably were not “crocodile tears,” a term which connotes false sincerity.

    And I am thrilled to bits about our new Presiding Bishop!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Notify me of followup comments via e-mail. You can also subscribe without commenting.